raxacorricofallapatorius: (is dead)
raxacorricofallapatorius ([personal profile] raxacorricofallapatorius) wrote2008-04-22 12:33 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

You know, I could have gone my whole lifetime without seeing Emma Watson's crotch...

But at least she was wearing (sort of) undies.

First beer, then crotch shots. What next? Sex tape?

*sigh* Why oh why do they have to grow up?

[identity profile] the-reda.livejournal.com 2008-04-22 10:37 am (UTC)(link)
Oh sheesh. Do I even want to know where and when that was published/taken?
ext_4831: My Headshot (Default)

[identity profile] hughcasey.livejournal.com 2008-04-22 10:43 am (UTC)(link)
What next? Sex tape?

We can only hope...

;-P
ext_38975: (Default)

[identity profile] torenheksje.livejournal.com 2008-04-22 10:55 am (UTC)(link)
At her 18th birthday party this week. Someone got a charming shot of her getting into/sitting into her car, and she's wearing some very expensive see-through undies.

If she'd have been wearing regular panties it wouldn't have been so bad - any woman knows how hard it can sometimes be to keep your thighs together while squatting and scootching to get into a car. But because they're sheer, you get to see quite a lot.

[identity profile] catsplay.livejournal.com 2008-04-22 10:56 am (UTC)(link)
I haven't heard about this either..?
ext_38975: (Default)

[identity profile] torenheksje.livejournal.com 2008-04-22 10:57 am (UTC)(link)
You're only getting away with that because she's of age in the US now. Shame on you! LOL! :cP
ext_38975: (Default)

[identity profile] torenheksje.livejournal.com 2008-04-22 10:58 am (UTC)(link)
It's been posted (with photo) on ONTD.

[identity profile] the-reda.livejournal.com 2008-04-22 11:00 am (UTC)(link)
Another reason why paparazzi should DIAF.

[identity profile] adaveen.livejournal.com 2008-04-22 12:58 pm (UTC)(link)
Because of they don't grow up some poor sucker has to feed them and be responsible for them forever.

Papps suck - she didn't do anything wrong. Papps are vultures.
ext_38975: (Default)

[identity profile] torenheksje.livejournal.com 2008-04-22 01:04 pm (UTC)(link)
No, not really, other than of choosing the wrong sort of underwear under the circumstances. Kind of an embarrassing lesson, but like I said, at least she was wearing *something*

I hate the paps. They're just parasites, really.

[identity profile] ook.livejournal.com 2008-04-22 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)
ONTD here I come! :D

[identity profile] razzle.livejournal.com 2008-04-22 03:42 pm (UTC)(link)
Crikey. I didn't need that either.

*goes back to admiring Equus photos*

[identity profile] oh--tsarevich.livejournal.com 2008-04-22 10:09 pm (UTC)(link)
What actually bugged me most was the (predictable) reaction this caused and the blatant misogyny of it.

DanRad gets naked for publicity photos.
ONTD: OMG AWESOME HOT I LOVE HIM NOT A MOMENT TOO SOON!

EWatson has photos taken of her against her will showing her underwear which she obviously didn't intend to show.
ONTD: OMG THAT NASTY WHORE! PUT IT AWAY! SKANK OMG SHE DIDN'T WASTE A MOMENT TO DO THIS AS SOON AS SHE WAS LEGAL HUH.

Seriously, people are calling her a whore and blaming her for it happening when she obviously was actually trying her best to not let anything show! ffs it's not like she's spreadeagled on the car seat, she's got her legs closed! Practically everyone's mum owns sheer underwear, how does being in a car + wearing sheer underwear = skank ho? Aagh sorry, this kind of thing gets me angry haha.

[identity profile] beemerbike.livejournal.com 2008-04-23 01:15 am (UTC)(link)
i rather like this idea. I wonder if it can get my wife to do something like this in the near future...perhaps involving one of the motorcycles.